Employee surveys are a cornerstone of workplace success, offering insights into employee sentiment, engagement, and performance. However, poorly designed surveys can lead to inaccurate data and missed opportunities for growth, providing very little insight into one of your most valuable assets: your employees.
At Fratzke, we believe that well-executed employee surveys are powerful tools for enhancing workplace culture and organizational performance. We developed this guide to walk you through understanding the value of employee surveys, and the types available, and provide expert guidelines for creating surveys that drive actionable results.
Key Takeaways:
With more than 35 years of experience working with top brands, we’re going to let you in on a secret: Employee surveys are an invaluable resource for gathering actionable feedback to improve workplace culture, employee satisfaction, and operational effectiveness. Workplace surveys measure everything from job satisfaction and engagement to leadership performance and inclusivity. By identifying organizational strengths and weaknesses, surveys help businesses make informed decisions and create a supportive, productive work environment. And these are just a few of the benefits to your business!
When designed and implemented strategically, employee surveys can reveal critical insights that drive meaningful change. Whether you’re enhancing employee engagement, addressing turnover, or refining benefits, surveys offer a structured approach to understanding your workforce’s needs and aspirations. Employee surveys go beyond simple questionnaires. Let’s get into the different types of employee surveys you can use.
The first type of employee survey is employee engagement surveys. These surveys measure the emotional connection employees feel toward their workplace. Engagement surveys uncover the factors that motivate employees and identify barriers to productivity.
Another type of survey is one that focuses on gauging how employees feel about their roles, responsibilities, and work environment. These surveys often highlight areas that require attention, such as workload or career development opportunities.
Just like the name suggests, 360-degree feedback surveys get input from various people to get a well-rounded picture of performance. People who are included in these surveys include supervisors, peers, and subordinates so leadership and interpersonal skills can be assessed.
Inclusion and belonging surveys are aimed at creating a supportive workplace for everyone. These surveys help identify gaps in diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.
Some common employee surveys that are typically used in most companies are exit interviews and boarding surveys. Exit interviews reveal why employees leave, while onboarding surveys ensure new hires have a positive start, offering insights to refine hiring practices.
Tailored to specific business needs, custom surveys can address niche issues for a business, like policy adoption or training program effectiveness.
Now that you know the different types of employee surveys that are used in workplaces, let’s talk about guidelines for creating impactful surveys that will provide value for your business and employees.
To gather meaningful insights, focus on observable behaviors rather than abstract concepts. Questions like “Does your manager ‘understand the marketplace’?” often yield subjective and unreliable responses, as personal biases and assumptions can skew answers.
Instead, frame questions around measurable actions. For example, ask, “How often does your manager resolve customer complaints thoroughly and promptly?” This ensures respondents base answers on firsthand experiences rather than speculation.
Observable behaviors are also easier to analyze and discuss, providing actionable data. Leaders, for instance, cannot dispute assessments tied to concrete events. This approach reduces biases, such as the “halo effect,” where appearance or personality unfairly influences opinions. Behavior-based questions can yield reliable insights that lead to meaningful improvements in both leadership and operations.
Incorporating verifiable questions into your survey ensures credibility and data accuracy. By “verifiable,” we mean questions that have answers with metrics to back them up. For example, ask respondents to assess the frequency of team accomplishments or measurable indicators, like on-time delivery rates. Cross-referencing these answers with actual performance data and key performance indicators (KPIs) validates survey findings, strengthening your ability to act on the results confidently.
These verifiable questions also allow organizations to measure the validity of new or experimental survey tools. An example of this would be, when assessing leadership skills, you can compare survey responses about employee retention with HR’s actual retention statistics. This alignment between subjective responses and objective metrics increases trust in your data collection methods and outcomes.
Our final guideline for content in employee surveys is to be focused on behaviors that are undoubtedly connected to organizational goals. Measuring irrelevant factors wastes resources and dilutes focus. Avoid general questions like “Do you enjoy workplace lunches?” unless directly tied to productivity or morale. Instead, ask whether communication within teams improves project outcomes.
Incorporating research-backed pairings between behaviors and outcomes helps align surveys with key performance indicators. For example, improved interdepartmental communication often correlates with reduced defect rates in manufacturing. We recommend focusing on proven links between actions and outcomes so you can create surveys that uncover actionable insights to improve performance.
When it comes to effective employee surveys, looks do matter. We have found that survey formatting affects response quality. Labels and page breaks can unconsciously bias respondents by grouping unrelated items together or emphasizing certain sections. To avoid this, keep sections continuous and unlabeled, encouraging respondents to approach each question independently.
Uninterrupted sections also streamline the user experience, reducing distractions and maintaining focus. Removing visual clutter, like boxes or bolded labels, encourages unbiased and thoughtful responses, delivering reliable data.
Consistency in question length and section size reduces unintended biases. Longer sections or wordier questions often result in inflated scores, as respondents perceive these items as more important. Large sections and long questions can also be overwhelming or confuse the respondents. Ensure every section contains a balanced number of questions, and use concise language to eliminate complexity.
Uniformity across sections also makes it easier for participants to navigate the survey and have an idea of how long the survey is going to take. This contributes to increased completion rates and improved data quality from your employee surveys.
In employee surveys, sensitive questions like demographics should appear last to reduce concerns about anonymity. This strategy encourages employee participation and honest responses.
It is also important to be clear about the use of demographic data to reinforce trust and ensure alignment with survey objectives. Placing sensitive questions at the end of the survey helps the respondent approach the survey with honesty, providing reliable feedback.
Language matters in survey design. Avoiding words with strong associations minimizes unconscious biases, such as those linked to gender or cultural stereotypes. For example, to ask how supervisors handle complex issues, use a question like “Does your manager discuss complex issues with clarity?" rather than “Does your manager have a strong grasp of complex problems?”.
The first question uses more neutral language than the second, as terms such as “strong” may be associated with a certain demographic and can skew answers. Using clear, inclusive language ensures respondents focus on the question’s intent rather than unintended implications.
Introducing negatively phrased questions disrupts response patterns and reduces agreement bias. For example, while using positively framed statements, include questions like “Does your department often fail to meet deadlines?” This strategy ensures respondents critically evaluate each question, providing a balanced view of employee sentiment.
You will want to explain this question format in the survey instructions to prevent confusion Educating participants on this approach leads to more thoughtful and accurate feedback.
Keeping questions focused on a single topic is a best practice for getting reliable responses. Compound questions can confuse respondents and obscure insights. For example, instead of asking, “Are you satisfied with your salary and benefits?” separate these into two questions to account for differing opinions on each topic.
Effective surveys rely on consistent, easily interpreted response scales. Using a numerical scale (e.g., 1-10) with descriptive words only at the ends, such as "strongly disagree" and "strongly agree," ensures that responses are clear and statistically reliable. This approach minimizes variability caused by subjective interpretation of middle labels.
For example, avoid scales like "poor, fair, good, very good, excellent," which may not represent evenly spaced intervals for every participant. Numerical scales provide uniformity, making it easier to analyze results and identify trends across groups or over time. What’s more is that numerical scales allow for advanced statistical techniques, so you can run even deeper analyses from your employee survey results and gain even more insights.
Frequency-based questions, such as "How often does your team meet deadlines?" (rated on a scale from "never" to "always"), yield more accurate data than general agree/disagree statements. Asking about frequency ties responses to specific, observable events, reducing subjectivity.
Frequency scales also have an added bonus since they can be used to generate normal distribution curves, enabling meaningful statistical analysis. An example of this would be when employees rate how often they receive constructive feedback. From the feedback in the employee surveys, trends emerge that can inform targeted interventions, like training programs or communication enhancements.
To design effective frequency-based questions, ensure that the scale is consistent and intuitive. Use percentages or ranges like "never, rarely, sometimes, often, always" for clarity and so you can get actionable insights from your employee surveys.
A single, standardized response scale improves consistency and simplifies the survey experience. We also recommend making the response scale an odd number. For example, use a scale of 1-7, where 1 represents "strongly disagree," 4 is neutral, and 7 represents "strongly agree." Odd-numbered scales provide a neutral midpoint for respondents who are undecided, enhancing data reliability.
Multiple scales within the same survey can confuse respondents and increase errors. Using a single, familiar format improves completion rates and allows for seamless comparison between questions. Another tip is to include neutral options, such as"not applicable" or "don’t know". This helps to prevent forced answers, ensuring responses reflect genuine perspectives.
Ranking questions, like "Rank the importance of these benefits from 1 to 5," often produce unreliable data due to biases like primacy and recency effects (favoring the first or last items). Rankings are difficult for respondents and can overwhelm them, especially when priorities are equally important.
Instead, use rating scales to evaluate individual items independently. Rating scales make it easier to identify which areas require improvement without forcing comparisons. For example, ask respondents to rate the importance of benefits such as healthcare or flexible scheduling on a scale of 1-10. This approach generates nuanced data and avoids artificial hierarchies that may not reflect employees' true preferences.
Anonymity is critical for obtaining honest feedback from employee surveys. Employees are more likely to share genuine opinions if they believe their responses cannot be traced back to them. To reinforce anonymity, use third-party survey platforms, a third-party agency, or paper-based submissions.
Communicate your commitment to confidentiality through transparent messaging prior to the employees taking the survey. Explain how data will be collected, stored, and used. Avoid identifiers like department names if they could indirectly reveal respondents' identities. This is particularly important in small teams where anonymity might feel compromised.
Offering anonymity builds trust and encourages higher participation rates. Employees are more willing to provide candid feedback, enabling your organization to uncover critical insights without fear of repercussions.
This guideline is mostly for large organizations and enterprises. In large organizations, department-level analysis is essential for actionable insights. Aggregating results by team or department helps identify localized strengths and challenges while maintaining individual anonymity. Department-based segmentation also helps establish accountability, as managers can take ownership of their team’s results
Customize reports to reflect the needs of different departments or units. For example, compare engagement levels between marketing and customer service teams to pinpoint specific areas for improvement. This granularity allows leadership to implement targeted interventions, ensuring resources are allocated effectively.
When administering employee surveys, it’s best to ensure that completion time is 20 minutes or less. Survey length significantly impacts participation rates and response quality. A survey that takes longer than 20 minutes risks respondent fatigue, leading to rushed answers or incomplete submissions.
Shorter surveys not only improve completion rates but also yield higher-quality data. Respondents are more thoughtful and thorough when they feel the process respects their time. Focus on concise, purposeful questions that align with your objectives. Avoid redundancy or overly complex formats. For longer surveys, consider breaking them into multiple sessions or distributing them at different times to maintain engagement.
Employee surveys should integrate into a larger feedback ecosystem that includes regular pulse surveys, real-time shift feedback, and annual assessments. That means that employee surveys are not a once-and-done action; they need to be conducted regularly, with the surveys themselves being adjusted and improved to produce valuable feedback. This ongoing approach fosters continuous improvement and demonstrates a commitment to employee well-being. Fratzke Consulting offers solutions to streamline the employee survey process, making it easy to gather, analyze, and act on survey data.
Tags:
At Fratzke, we specialize in designing employee survey strategies that deliver actionable insights. Whether you’re enhancing engagement, improving retention, or driving productivity, our tailored solutions can help. Are you ready to gain insights into what your employees are really thinking? Contact us today to discover how our expertise can transform your workplace into a thriving hub of satisfaction and success.
201 Harbor Blvd.
Suite 203
Fullerton, CA, 92832
Phone: (714) 614-2881
Hours: Monday - Friday 8AM-6PM
